Speaker, for years the Liberals have misled Canadians on the definition of marriage, in the same way they have misled Canadians on the purpose of the sponsorship program. Coldheartedness is! He thinks it is about pollution.
Moreover, throughout the debate on Bill CI have been able to count on the cooperation, open-mindedness and professionalism of my hon.
The same is true of those who oppose same-sex marriage for other reasons. That's how the change in a society occurs. Church of Sweden. Thai Theravada Buddhists over million membersbeing the more conservative wing of Buddhism are less supportive of gay rights and marriages. Were the federal courts to recognize such a right, it would be completely without constitutional basis.
I'm not a hypocrite; I state my positions. Society Marriage Us Europe.
My last point is to dispel the myth of partisanship. However, if there is a broader appeal to the community, then we are in danger of running afoul of our human rights laws. All rights for all individuals in society are already protected by legislation.
Some members are laughing over there. We would spend our money more wisely and clean up government waste and mismanagement. I, along with 10 other members of Parliament, who represent more than a million Canadians, had the opportunity to question him. What is more, many Canadian gays and lesbians are of such strong character that they are prepared to acknowledge their sexual orientation publicly.
It is not speculation that this will be the reality. These are important elements with which not only the national round table but the standing committee and others deal.